<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Improving students’ understanding by building a culture of academic integrity	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.lynettepretorius.com/the_scholars_way_blog/improving-students-understanding-by-building-a-culture-of-academic-integrity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.lynettepretorius.com/the_scholars_way_blog/improving-students-understanding-by-building-a-culture-of-academic-integrity/</link>
	<description>Educator and researcher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 00:23:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Lynette Pretorius		</title>
		<link>https://www.lynettepretorius.com/the_scholars_way_blog/improving-students-understanding-by-building-a-culture-of-academic-integrity/#comment-10436</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lynette Pretorius]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2025 08:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.lynettepretorius.com/?p=272#comment-10436</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.lynettepretorius.com/the_scholars_way_blog/improving-students-understanding-by-building-a-culture-of-academic-integrity/#comment-10428&quot;&gt;Seema Saran&lt;/a&gt;.

I think it is important to move away from trying to police AI use - it is not possible (you are right - the detectors are completely unreliable!) and causes undue anxiety for everyone. Additionally, it is also pointless, because AI will be integrated in everything we do. Instead, we need to teach our students how to use AI well. This includes acknowledging which work they did and which work the AI did. I have developed a simple structure for students to use to acknowledge AI use in their work: https://youtu.be/10BXrFC6N_M]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.lynettepretorius.com/the_scholars_way_blog/improving-students-understanding-by-building-a-culture-of-academic-integrity/#comment-10428">Seema Saran</a>.</p>
<p>I think it is important to move away from trying to police AI use &#8211; it is not possible (you are right &#8211; the detectors are completely unreliable!) and causes undue anxiety for everyone. Additionally, it is also pointless, because AI will be integrated in everything we do. Instead, we need to teach our students how to use AI well. This includes acknowledging which work they did and which work the AI did. I have developed a simple structure for students to use to acknowledge AI use in their work: <a href="https://youtu.be/10BXrFC6N_M" rel="nofollow ugc">https://youtu.be/10BXrFC6N_M</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Seema Saran		</title>
		<link>https://www.lynettepretorius.com/the_scholars_way_blog/improving-students-understanding-by-building-a-culture-of-academic-integrity/#comment-10428</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seema Saran]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2025 06:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.lynettepretorius.com/?p=272#comment-10428</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[One issue I’ve noticed more often is the growing doubt around whether students’ work is truly their own, mainly because AI detection tools can be unreliable. They sometimes flag content incorrectly, which makes it harder to have fair conversations with students. I recently read about DocuMark by Trinka, which takes a different path by helping students take responsibility for how they’ve used AI. Encouraging this kind of reflection could lead to more honest and productive interactions in the classroom.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One issue I’ve noticed more often is the growing doubt around whether students’ work is truly their own, mainly because AI detection tools can be unreliable. They sometimes flag content incorrectly, which makes it harder to have fair conversations with students. I recently read about DocuMark by Trinka, which takes a different path by helping students take responsibility for how they’ve used AI. Encouraging this kind of reflection could lead to more honest and productive interactions in the classroom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
